Started by Nick, October 20, 2016, 18:02:39 pm
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: DavidL on November 06, 2016, 15:47:43 pmAnyone?
Quote from: döm on November 06, 2016, 17:22:16 pmPerhaps the instigators of the referendum should have thought about that before hand. How the process would work from beginning to end. How to avoid this mess.
Quote from: Moving Target on November 06, 2016, 14:45:27 pmYou don't think that calling judges 'enemies of the people' for upholding the law regarding Parliamentary democracy is a fascist thing to do?
Quote from: DavidL on November 06, 2016, 17:33:22 pmBut this particular mess would not exist if the referendum result was accepted by all.(No one has an answer to my question it seems)
Quote from: Chris Quartly on November 06, 2016, 17:56:15 pmIt isn't a question about how it is accepted, it's a question of what is law, it isn't something you can pick and choose.
Quote from: Nick on November 06, 2016, 17:57:02 pmHere's an (un)subltle story from the daily mail, terrible story of 3 people being killed by a Polish lorry driver on a mobile. Why the need to point out the driver was Polish, would they say it was due to a Northern Irish or Scottish driver in the headline?Can't you feel the lurch to the far right?
Quote from: DavidL on November 06, 2016, 17:59:02 pmDon't you think the architects of the EU should have given that a little more thought when they devised article 50? No surprise that the process of one state leaving the bloc is as ill-thought out as many other aspects."Leave, you say. Leave? How very dare you!"
Quote from: DavidL on November 06, 2016, 14:16:11 pmThat's fine but the conundrum remains - on what basis would most MPs vote to trigger article 50 other than their desire for the UK to remain in or leave the EU?
Quote from: Nick on November 06, 2016, 18:25:23 pmReported he was Polish in the text but not a screaming headline. From his name you could have a good guess at his nationality, the crime was using a mobile while driving, not being Polish.
Quote from: DavidL on November 06, 2016, 18:04:49 pmIf the ruling was necessary, can you answer my previous question?
Quote from: Chris Quartly on November 06, 2016, 23:17:35 pmIt seems as if it is necessary, as a matter of process. It really seems irrelevant.Presumably the MPs are voting in accordance with their constituents (who voted them in, and could vote them out), I don't see the problem. It seems a pointless question, there is a process, and people have to accept that, just like people are saying they have to accept the referendum, all part of the process, you don't get to cherry pick when things suit you or not (seems a common occurrence from both sides of the argument).
Page created in 0.048 seconds with 21 queries.