Author Topic: Gibson vs PRS  (Read 32293 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Danforth

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6678
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #30 on: January 16, 2008, 12:32:10 PM »


I would get the graphtech one mate (the black one). The teflon in this leaves some particles on the strings that lubricate them so to speak, so your strings won't "stick" to the nut. 43 mm is LP size I think so that should be good. Better send them an e-mail before order to make sure this will fit though.

Neillwith2Ls

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12804
  • The world is turnin', I hope it don't turn away...
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #31 on: January 16, 2008, 12:59:27 PM »
Quote


I would get the graphtech one mate (the black one). The teflon in this leaves some particles on the strings that lubricate them so to speak, so your strings won't "stick" to the nut. 43 mm is LP size I think so that should be good. Better send them an e-mail before order to make sure this will fit though.

Thanks for the tip mate :)

I used to use lead shavings from a pencil to lubricate my nut :D
17/04/92 - Wembley Arena, London
08/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
09/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
11/09/04 - NEC, Birmingham
24/05/13 - O2 Arena, London

- 'Decreasing Circles' - Geist (Decreasing Circles, 2006)

Danforth

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6678
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #32 on: January 16, 2008, 13:16:12 PM »
Quote

Thanks for the tip mate :)

I used to use lead shavings from a pencil to lubricate my nut :D

You're welcome.

Lead Shavings hey? Well there's graphite in that so I guess it'll work a bit, but I guess it will wear off pretty quickly when grease and dust come around the corner.

Let me know if the nut change has worked out for the better okay?

Neillwith2Ls

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12804
  • The world is turnin', I hope it don't turn away...
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #33 on: January 16, 2008, 17:29:08 PM »
Quote
Let me know if the nut change has worked out for the better okay?

Will do, just emailed my mate the guitar tinker; I don't really fancy the job myself really :-/ :-[ :D
17/04/92 - Wembley Arena, London
08/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
09/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
11/09/04 - NEC, Birmingham
24/05/13 - O2 Arena, London

- 'Decreasing Circles' - Geist (Decreasing Circles, 2006)

Stu Clark

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
  • D'you hear what Stu just said about Queensryche?
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2008, 09:18:38 AM »
Quote
Interesting.

I'm looking to invest in a new guitar for the covers band I'm in, and have been toying with the idea of a PRS SE Singlecut - does anyone have any experience with them?

I've got an Epiphone Les Paul Limited Edition, but even after putting some decent tuning pegs on, it can't seem to stay in tune. The band is a rock covers band, and it gets a fair bit of bashing around.

Hi Neill,
I have a PRS SE singlecut and think that for

Slim

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29601
  • catch the taxi driver weeping like a wounded beast
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #35 on: January 17, 2008, 12:34:49 PM »
Quote
Of course all of Lerxt's Gibson are great, they're custom made or at least tweaked up beyond measure.  But buying a Gibson off the shelf is like entering a lottery (IMHO of course).

Definitely, I'm afraid. My Gibson '60 reissue Les Paul felt like a plywood copy compared to my Sid Poole LP replica.

Can't quite call myself a Gibson hater, though. Love the design, hate the way they make them.

Stu Clark

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
  • D'you hear what Stu just said about Queensryche?
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #36 on: January 17, 2008, 16:30:17 PM »
Quote

Love the design, hate the way they make them.

What he said!

Neillwith2Ls

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12804
  • The world is turnin', I hope it don't turn away...
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #37 on: January 18, 2008, 16:23:04 PM »
Thanks for the thumbs up for the SE Single-Cut Stu; I'll see if I can find a shop with some in stock and try one out I think. I know it's only
17/04/92 - Wembley Arena, London
08/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
09/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
11/09/04 - NEC, Birmingham
24/05/13 - O2 Arena, London

- 'Decreasing Circles' - Geist (Decreasing Circles, 2006)

Stu Clark

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
  • D'you hear what Stu just said about Queensryche?
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #38 on: January 19, 2008, 14:29:13 PM »
My understanding is that SEs are not chambered.  

Neillwith2Ls

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12804
  • The world is turnin', I hope it don't turn away...
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #39 on: January 20, 2008, 15:20:16 PM »
Quote
My understanding is that SEs are not chambered.
17/04/92 - Wembley Arena, London
08/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
09/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
11/09/04 - NEC, Birmingham
24/05/13 - O2 Arena, London

- 'Decreasing Circles' - Geist (Decreasing Circles, 2006)

Stu Clark

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
  • D'you hear what Stu just said about Queensryche?
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #40 on: January 21, 2008, 17:07:11 PM »
Time to confess my total ignorance of chambering and what is is supposed to do - please educate me, guitar yoda Neill...

Neillwith2Ls

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12804
  • The world is turnin', I hope it don't turn away...
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #41 on: January 22, 2008, 08:06:58 AM »
Hahaha, hardly a jedimaster...!

When I said chambered, I meant that it's not a totally solid body; ie. has hollow chambers in the 'wings', under the top wood. This makes the guitar lighter (the recent Gibson BFG Les Paul is chambered; much lighter guitar) but arguably affects the tonality of the instrument.
17/04/92 - Wembley Arena, London
08/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
09/09/04 - Wembley Arena, London
11/09/04 - NEC, Birmingham
24/05/13 - O2 Arena, London

- 'Decreasing Circles' - Geist (Decreasing Circles, 2006)

Fuzzface

  • TNMS Management
  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34296
  • RAWK!
    • MySpace band site
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #42 on: January 22, 2008, 08:55:43 AM »

I think they're sometimes referred to as "semi-hollow".....I think Fender has used that term....I seem to remember a mate of mine having one of those.

Looked just like an ordinary Stratocaster, but I thought it lacked sustain.... :-/

Stu Clark

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
  • D'you hear what Stu just said about Queensryche?
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #43 on: January 22, 2008, 13:17:43 PM »
Ahhhhhh.  So I'm guesssing that chambering is a bad thing.  Need the wood for the sustain!

Stu Clark

  • TNMS Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
  • D'you hear what Stu just said about Queensryche?
Re: Gibson vs PRS
« Reply #44 on: January 22, 2008, 13:24:44 PM »
Should say that the SE singlecut is surprisingly light (especially compared to the Custom 24) but it does have the sustain of infinity.