Started by Bez, April 14, 2018, 11:46:55 am
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Slim on April 15, 2018, 17:31:59 pmI did, someone with nothing to say.
Quote from: Slim on April 15, 2018, 22:49:23 pmPerhaps I misunderstood you - why do you think that no-one can know if the decision to attack the Syrian sites was the right one?
Quote from: Slim on April 16, 2018, 17:27:24 pmI accept that there's a case to answer for the PM and cabinet taking this action without parliamentary approval, but as I understand it, it is not actually required.Here are legitimate reasons for not seeking parliament's consent: a debate in parliament with a 'yes' vote telegraphs to the Syrians that the bombs are coming and putsUK service personnel lives at risk, as well as potentially limiting the effectiveness of the strike for operational reasons the PM was never going to tell parliament exactly what was going to happenanywayHere's a less legitimate reason: She knew she might not get the necessary approval
Quote from: DavidL on April 16, 2018, 18:58:47 pmIt's unbelievable that some are giving Corbyn a realistic chance of running the country.
Quote from: Bez on April 16, 2018, 20:41:20 pmAny decent party would be grinding Corbyn into the dirt...
Quote from: Nick on April 16, 2018, 20:34:23 pmAre we happy then to watch people get dismembered and blown to pieces in Yemen rather than choked to death in Syria?
Quote from: Bez on April 16, 2018, 20:39:05 pm3. LoL!
Quote from: Slim on April 17, 2018, 11:13:15 amThis was brilliant:https://twitter.com/theJeremyVine/status/985922617172471809Also, presented without comment: https://twitter.com/P_G_Thompson/status/985977817610575873
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 21 queries.